Same sex marriages right or wrong-Same-sex marriage - Wikipedia

On June 26, , the U. Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling that granted same-sex couples a constitutional right to marry. The decision in Obergefell v. Hodges legalized gay marriage nationwide, including in the 14 states that did not previously allow gays and lesbians to wed. As we approach the fourth anniversary of the ruling, here are five key facts about same-sex marriage:.

Same sex marriages right or wrong

Same sex marriages right or wrong

Same sex marriages right or wrong

Same sex marriages right or wrong

However, this is not seen as homosexual, but is instead a Illustrated first date sex for families Same sex marriages right or wrong sons to keep their inheritance within the family. Among the Igbo people and probably other peoples in the south of the country, there are circumstances where a marriage between women is Same sex marriages right or wrong appropriate, such as when a woman rihht no child and her husband dies, and she takes a wife to perpetuate her inheritance and family lineage. On 12 Junethe Governor of Chihuahua announced that his administration would no longer oppose same-sex marriages in the state. Share Tweet Email 1. This is near the top of your list of things that keep you up at night? Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing. No other form of civil union is recognized. Main Teens musicals Civil union. We have supplied this link to an article on an external website in good faith. However, the text aimed mxrriages introduce as well in the Constitution for the first time ever the definition of marriage, which would be the sole "union between a man and a woman".

Global america pageant. Navigation menu

However they would serve gay people and couples in their store. Michael M. It Does Not Create a Family but a Naturally Sterile Union Traditional marriage is usually so fecund that those who would frustrate its end must do violence to nature to prevent the birth of children by using contraception. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children. Marriage is a precious gift given from the good lord up above. US October 13th, Diane, like Same sex marriages right or wrong many issues in this world we need to strike a balance in our approach. Don't attack individuals, denominations, or other organizations. In recent years, the topic of whether same-sex marriage is right or wrong has created a controversy. We use the information that we collect to operate and maintain our Sites, send you marketing communications, and respond to your Same sex marriages right or wrong and concerns. It has helped grant homosexuals the ability to get married while also helping or hurting heterosexuals depending on their opinion of whether same-sex marriage is right. We stand on Gods Word regardless of it being "relevant" the very act of approving such behaviour is sin. Frankly, Tranny club chaos dc blog demonstrates that at least in this area, the Bible is not your authority and you have a low view of Scripture.

Prior to their decision, same-sex marriage was already legal in 37 states and Washington DC, but was banned in the remaining

  • Gay marriage is one of the biggest social issues debated today.
  • It flat out is just not right at all.

Prior to their decision, same-sex marriage was already legal in 37 states and Washington DC, but was banned in the remaining Proponents of legal gay marriage contend that gay marriage bans are discriminatory and unconstitutional, and that same-sex couples should have access to all the benefits enjoyed by different-sex couples.

Opponents contend that marriage has traditionally been defined as being between one man and one woman, and that marriage is primarily for procreation. Did You Know? On May 17, , the first legal gay marriage in the United States was performed in Cambridge, MA between Tanya McCloskey, a massage therapist, and Marcia Kadish, an employment manager at an engineering firm. The world's first legal gay marriage ceremony took place in the Netherlands on Apr. The four couples, one female and three male, were married in a televised ceremony officiated by the mayor of Amsterdam.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated on Dec. An Oct. Proper citation depends on your preferred or required style manual. Here are the proper bibliographic citations for this page according to four style manuals in alphabetical order :. Skip to content. Gay Marriage. Should Gay Marriage Be Legal? On July 25, Miami-Dade County Circuit Court Judge Sarah Zabel ruled Florida's gay marriage ban unconstitutional and stated that the ban "serves only to hurt, to discriminate, to deprive same-sex couples and their families of equal dignity, to label and treat them as second-class citizens, and to deem them unworthy of participation in one of the fundamental institutions of our society.

We have joined together to recognize equality for racial minorities, women, people with disabilities, immigrants As explained by David S. Nancy, a woman, can marry Tom, but Bill, a man, cannot Nancy can do something marry Tom that Bill cannot, simply because Nancy is a woman and Bill is a man. Pro 2 Same-sex couples should have access to the same benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples. There are 1, benefits, rights and protections available to married couples in federal law alone, according to a General Accounting Office assessment made in Harvard University historian Nancy F.

Cott stated that until two centuries ago, "monogamous households were a tiny, tiny portion" of the world's population, and were found only in "Western Europe and little settlements in North America. LaFleur that the "freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause.

Pro 5 Marriage is an internationally recognized human right for all people. Since the US Supreme Court has declared 14 times that marriage is a fundamental right for all, according to the American Foundation for Equal Rights.

They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. Non-discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation has therefore become an internationally recognized principle. Pro 6 Same-sex marriage is a civil right.

Virginia that marriage is "one of the basic civil rights of man. Pro 7 Marriage is not only for procreation, otherwise infertile couples or couples not wishing to have children would be prevented from marrying.

Ability or desire to create offspring has never been a qualification for marriage. Pro 8 Gay marriages can bring financial gain to federal, state, and local governments and can help boost the economy. Government revenue from marriage comes from marriage licenses, higher income taxes in some circumstances the so-called "marriage penalty" , and decreases in costs for state benefit programs. Pro 9 Gay couples make good parents.

A June peer-reviewed University of Melbourne study showed that children raised by same-sex parents score about six percent higher than the general population on measures of general health and family cohesion. Pro 10 Gay marriage bans cause humiliation and uncertainty for children being raised by same-sex couples. In ruling Texas' gay marriage ban unconstitutional, San Antonio-based federal judge Orlando Garcia stated that the ban "causes needless stigmatization and humiliation for children being raised by the loving same-sex couples being targeted.

Pro 11 Marriage provides both physical and psychological health benefits, and banning gay marriage increases rates of psychological disorders. A study published on Apr. Rather, anthropological research supports the conclusion that a vast array of family types, including families built upon same-sex partnerships, can contribute to stable and humane societies. Pro 13 Gay marriage legalization is correlated with lower divorce rates, while gay marriage bans are correlated with higher divorce rates.

Massachusetts, which became the first US state to legalize gay marriage in , had the lowest divorce rate in the country in Alaska, which altered its constitution to prohibit gay marriage in , saw a The seven states with the highest divorce rates between and all had constitutional prohibitions to gay marriage.

Pro 14 Legal marriage is a secular institution that should not be limited by religious objections to same-sex marriage. Religious institutions can decline to marry gay and lesbian couples if they wish, but they should not dictate marriage laws for society at large.

As explained by People for the American Way, "As a legal matter, marriage is a civil institution Marriage is also a religious institution, defined differently by different faiths and congregations. In America, the distinction can get blurry because states permit clergy to carry out both religious and civil marriage in a single ceremony. Religious Right leaders have exploited that confusion by claiming that granting same-sex couples equal access to civil marriage would somehow also redefine the religious institution of marriage Schwarzenegger that "[c]ivil law has always been supreme in defining and regulating marriage.

Pro 15 Many religious leaders and churches support gay marriage and say it is consistent with scripture. And they [religious people] see that love in our families, and I think people can't help but be supportive. The United Church of Christ General Synod voted in July to affirm "equal marriage rights for couples regardless of gender.

Con 1 The institution of marriage has traditionally been defined as being between a man and a woman. Sutton wrote that "marriage has long been a social institution defined by relationships between men and women. So long defined, the tradition is measured in millennia, not centuries or decades. So widely shared, the tradition until recently had been adopted by all governments and major religions of the world.

Nelson, the Supreme Court of Minnesota found that "the institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within a family, is as old as the book of Genesis. Harvey, MA, STL, late Catholic priest, wrote in July that "Throughout the history of the human race the institution of marriage has been understood as the complete spiritual and bodily communion of one man and one woman. Con 2 Marriage is for procreation and should not be extended to same-sex couples because they cannot produce children together.

Allowing gay marriage would only further shift the purpose of marriage from producing and raising children to adult gratification. Same-sex couples can never provide a child with both her biological mother and her biological father. Seemingly infertile heterosexual couples sometimes produce children, and medical advances may allow others to procreate in the future. Heterosexual couples who do not wish to have children are still biologically capable of having them, and may change their minds.

Con 3 Children need both a mother and a father. Girls who are raised apart from their fathers are reportedly at higher risk for early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy. I don't want to see children being engineered for same-sex couples where there is either a mom missing or a dad missing. Dobson, Founder and Chairman of Focus on the Family, predicted in that legalizing same-sex marriage will enable "group marriage," "marriage between daddies and little girls," and "marriage between a man and his donkey.

Con 5 Allowing gay couples to wed could further weaken the institution of marriage. Anderson, William E. Redefining marriage to include same-sex relationships is the culmination of this revisionism, and it would leave emotional intensity as the only thing that sets marriage apart from other bonds.

Con 6 Homosexuality is immoral and unnatural. Matt Barber, Associate Dean for Online Programs at Liberty University School of Law, stated that "Every individual engaged in the homosexual lifestyle, who has adopted a homosexual identity, they know, intuitively, that what they're doing is immoral, unnatural, and self-destructive, yet they thirst for that affirmation.

Marriage is holy, while homosexual acts go against the natural moral law. Con 7 Gay marriage is contrary to the word of God and is incompatible with the beliefs, sacred texts, and traditions of many religious groups. The Bible, in Leviticus , states: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination," thus condemning homosexual relationships.

No ideology can erase from the human spirit the certainty that marriage exists solely between a man and a woman…" [ 54 ] Pope Benedict stated in Jan. Maryland ended health insurance benefits for new domestic partnerships after same-sex marriage became legal in the state in Con 9 Gay marriage will accelerate the assimilation of gays into mainstream heterosexual culture to the detriment of the homosexual community. The gay community has created its own vibrant culture.

By reducing the differences in opportunities and experiences between gay and heterosexual people, this unique culture may cease to exist.

Lesbian activist M. Lee Badgett, PhD, Director of the Center for Public Policy and Administration at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, stated that for many gay activists "marriage means adopting heterosexual forms of family and giving up distinctively gay family forms and perhaps even gay and lesbian culture. Con 10 Marriage is an outmoded, oppressive institution that should be weakened, not expanded.

LGBT lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender activist collective Against Equality states that "Gay marriage apes hetero privilege The family is the microcosm of oppression.

Con 11 People should not have their tax dollars used to support something they believe is wrong. Peter S. Sprigg, MDiv, Senior Fellow for Policy Studies at the Family Research Council, said that if gay marriage were legalized, "[t]axpayers, consumers, and businesses would be forced to subsidize homosexual relationships One of the key arguments often heard in support of homosexual civil marriage revolves around all the government 'benefits' that homosexuals claim they are denied.

Many of these 'benefits' involve one thing—taxpayer money that homosexuals are eager to get their hands on. On Dec. Con 12 Marriage is a privilege, not a right.

The US Constitution contains no explicit right to marry. The Illinois Family Institute states that if gay marriage is legalized, "Children will be taught that homosexuality is morally equivalent to heterosexuality They will be taught that opposition to both was motivated by ignorance and hatred. To be brainwashed to think that homosexuality is the moral equivalent of heterosexuality.

Your interactions with these features are governed by the privacy policy of the organization providing it. Taking a Principled not a Personal Stand In writing this statement, we have no intention to defame or disparage anyone. For example, a church may collect personal information about members and input it into a church management software program licensed from CPH. That's a pretty dismissive statement ignoring all the societal implications of redefining one of the foundational institutions of civilization. By submitting Feedback to CPH through our Sites or elsewhere, you assign to us, free of charge, all worldwide rights, title and interest in all copyrights and other intellectual property rights in the Feedback you submit. Jefferson Ave.

Same sex marriages right or wrong

Same sex marriages right or wrong

Same sex marriages right or wrong

Same sex marriages right or wrong

Same sex marriages right or wrong. Why Same Sex Marriage Should Be Legal

We also may collect data through our partners on their websites or mobile applications. When you visit such websites or mobile applications, we may receive certain information about you as described below.

We do send promotional emails and we may send you service related emails related to your account. If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you may opt out of them at privacy cph.

We may receive reports based on the use of these technologies by such companies on an individual as well as aggregated basis. Our partners may also use such technologies to deliver advertisements to you as described below.

Users can control the use of cookies at the individual browser level. If you reject cookies, you may still use our Sites, but your ability to use some features or areas of our Sites may be limited.

Personal information may be accessed by us or transferred to us in the United States or to our affiliates, partners, merchants, or service providers elsewhere in the world.

By providing us with personal information, you consent to this transfer. For example, when you access our Sites, our servers automatically record certain information that your web browser sends whenever you visit any website. We do not link this automatically-collected data to personally identifiable information. Individuals seeking to access or correct, amend or delete inaccurate data on CPH Web Products should direct his or her query directly with the Entity who has collected that information.

For example, a church may collect personal information about members and input it into a church management software program licensed from CPH. CPH will retain this personal information as necessary to comply with our legal obligations, resolve disputes and enforce our agreements. We use the information that we collect to operate and maintain our Sites, send you marketing communications, and respond to your questions and concerns.

We may store personal information in locations outside the direct control of CPH for instance, on servers or databases co-located with hosting providers. Any personally identifiable information you elect to make publicly available on our Sites, such as posting comments on our blog page, will be available to others.

If you remove information that you have made public on our Sites, copies may remain viewable in cached and archived pages of our Sites, or if other users have copied or saved that information. Some of our services are managed by a third party application that may require you to register to use or post a comment.

We do not have access or control of the information posted. To learn how the third party application uses your information, please review their privacy policy. Our third party partners may use technologies such as cookies to gather information about your activities on other sites in order to provide you advertising based upon your browsing activities and interests. If you access the CPH Service or Sites on your mobile device, you may not be able to control tracking technologies through the settings.

We collect information globally and primarily store that information in the United States. We transfer, process and store your information outside your country of residence, wherever we or our third-party service providers operate for the purposes of providing you the services. You agree that CPH may store and process personal date in the United States of America and any other country where CPH or its third-party service providers maintain facilities.

Whenever we transfer your information, we take steps necessary to protect it. CPH is concerned with protecting your privacy and data, but we cannot ensure or warrant the security of any information you transmit to CPH or guarantee that your information may not be accessed, disclosed, altered or destroyed by breach of any of our industry standard physical, technical or managerial safeguards.

Therefore, we cannot guarantee its absolute security. We use an outside a credit card processing company to process your payment if you purchase goods or services from CPH. In the event that personal information is compromised as a breach of security, CPH will promptly notify our affected customers in compliance with applicable law.

For current CPH customers, you can review, correct, update or delete inaccuracies to the information about you that CPH keeps on file by logging into your account to update your password and billing information. We will acknowledge your request and handle it promptly. We will retain your information for as long as your account is active or as needed to provide you services. We will retain and use your information as necessary to comply with our legal obligations, resolve disputes and enforce our agreements.

Protecting the privacy of young children is especially important. For that reason, CPH does not knowingly collect or solicit personal information from anyone under the age of In the event that we learn that we have collected personal information from a child under age 13, we will delete that information as quickly as possible. It is our policy to provide notifications, whether such notifications are required by law or are for marketing or other business related purposes, to you via email, written or hard copy notice, or through conspicuous posting of such notice on the Sites, as determined by CPH in its sole discretion.

We reserve the right to determine the form and means of providing notifications to you, provided that you may opt out of certain means of notification as described in this Privacy Policy. We are not responsible for the practices employed by websites or services linked to or from the CPH Sites, including the information or content contained therein.

Please remember that when you use a link to go from the CPH Sites to another website or service, our Privacy Policy does not apply to third-party websites or services. And we as authors did not want to be responsible for introducing people to the knowledge of such evil practices. US October 16th, It is just like the Bible says about people being "lovers of themselves".

That's what we are seeing in society today. People don't want to do what is right. They want to glorify themselves, what they want and to hell with God. When we rebel against God, we always work against ourselves. That's how nature works. It is better for people if they work to stay away from sin and that's what homosexuality it, a sin. This makes the demons scream when said, but it is the truth, no matter what anyone thinks, even me.

AU October 15th, It was for this purpose that He made them male and female. I have not read this book yet, but as a Born Again Christian, I would just like to share my understanding of the Bible and God's Love in this issue. To me the Word of God is clear that homosexuality is wrong. I think we must follow God's example, love the sinner but not the sin.

We do not have to like or agree with the homosexual lifestyle or gay marriage or vote in favour of it, When the time comes, God is quite capable of judging without our help. We are on this earth to let the light of Jesus shine through us, showing love and compassion for those who are lost and pray for them. We do not have to treat these people with disdain, disrespect or shun them. Let the compassion of Jesus rise in us, pray and let the Holy Spirit work.

Gary Bates October 15th, Diane, like so many issues in this world we need to strike a balance in our approach. But I think my colleagues would agree with me when I say that as Christians, I believe it is actually our job to judge sin--particularly areas where the Bible's teaching is clear on the matter.

Many churches have measures to judge and deal with sin within congregations, for example. The writings of the Apostles are pretty clear on judging misbehavior and dealing with it. And in the book of Revelations, believers are given a role along with Christ to judge. I think that when Christ is saying 'not to judge others' you'll note he focuses on the heart attitude of the person judging.

We ought not to have a judgmental attitude with great beams or logs in our eyes. The booklet seeks to understand that homosexuality is a genuine issue that people struggle with and often they feel that they cannot do anything about their 'orientation' etc. But to let people continue to sin and fall outside of Christ would not be kind, hence why we are given the ability to judge, but in love, of course.

I think it would be a valuable read for you given your sentiments as it displays a lot of compassion for those trapped in the lifestyle. Monika C. It is a sad situation that a separate publication on this topic 'Gay marriage: right or wrong?

Obviously, people need to go back to spending time reading God's word. There are many mentions in the Bible about homosexuality - just consider what happened nto Sodom and Gomorrah but then again, the Bible is no longer considered as God's word by which to live. Truly, we are living in the last days! Bob S. US October 15th, Lita: I hear you saying that the tone of the booklet is engaging and constructive. But I must repeat that there are far, far worse issues for modern society than gay marriage.

Lita Cosner October 15th, I'm not concerned with 'getting very far in government'; we wrote this booklet to and for Christians and those interested in the biblical view on the issue.

I read your blog, though our feedback rules don't allow us to publish the link. Frankly, that blog demonstrates that at least in this area, the Bible is not your authority and you have a low view of Scripture. As such, we'll probably talk past each other. But what I find surprising is that you aren't even able to put yourself in an evangelical's shoes and see why it would be a huge issue to us, and well-worth publishing a booklet about.

Michael M. US October 13th, If I may, I really urge that the phrase "gay marriage" not be used to describe "same sex marriage".

There has not been any problem heretofore with a "gay" person marrying. New laws were not needed for a "gay" person to marry. Heterosexual and homosexual persons heretofore had the same rights to marry. If you were a man and you wanted to marry, you found a woman who would have you and you got married. If you were a woman and wanted to marry, you found a man who would have you and you got married.

If you wanted to have close friends of the same sex, in addition to having a spouse of the opposite sex, you did. No problem. Now, in some US states and other countries where "same sex marrige" unfortunately is legal, a man can marry a man and a woman can marry a woman.

In such places, if you are a man and want to marry, you can marry a man or a woman, and if you are a woman you can marry a woman or a man. So I submit that what we have now is marriage and "same sex marriage", not marriage and "gay marriage".

Therefore, I urge that we all use the term "same sex marriage", rather than "gay marriage" to describe same sex marriage. Lita Cosner October 14th, I understand your point, but in order to communicate effectively with the culture, we have to use the language that is common in the culture.

And 'gay marriage' now communicates someone marrying an individual of the same sex. Donald M. Not having read this booklet yet, but having followed the progress of the movement over the past 20 years especially, I'm especially thrilled how God has raised up groups like pfox on the net They broke off from Exodus Int'l when the latter announced that the Bible is erroneous in places and "NOT born gay" on Facebook, who lists many testimonies of God's deliverance from sexual perversion, including her own.

Sordid details are not needed, but graphic language is at times beneficial so the reader is clear on what the issue is and is not. As a young Christian decades ago, I grew tired of well-meaning teachers who referred to things obliquely; yes, folks were less likely to take offense, but others of us wanted enough clarity to actually understand the subject.

A difficult issue in writing this booklet was to make it informative and frankly discussing the issues without being graphic. Our goal was to make this a helpful resource to as many as possible, part of which was keeping people with sensitive imaginations or consciences in mind. I think if you read the booklet you'll be pleasantly surprised by the tone and content.

Ken K. If you really believed this was important as you say it is, you would share the Gospel and God's Word without trying to get money for it, i. All the staff and writers at CMI work at sacrificial rates to bring quality information which we price to make it as widely available as possible. Let me put this in perspective: you can get this booklet for the same price as a latte, or a gallon of gas.

Publishing resources like this does not bring in lots of money because our goal is to make them available to as many people as possible; we remain dependent on the gifts of faithful supporters to continue the ministry. All that being said, your comment about 'making merchandise' of the Gospel is unfortunate. If you think that this booklet should be available freely, you are always welcome to buy it and give it away to the people you think should have it freely, if your comment was made in concern for a particular person who cannot afford even the minimal cost of the booklet.

We even have bulk discounts which make it even easier to do so. This seems to be the same driving force behind barring any christian symbols or displays from the public by militant atheists; if everyone else is prevented from showing their faith then the atheists feel justified in their view of evolution.

In other words as evangelist Ray Comfort calls the illogical concept "nothing created everything". Mike A.

same-sex marriage | History, Status Around the World, & Facts | 804case.com

Gay marriage is one of the biggest social issues debated today. As presidents, prime ministers, and many prominent Christian leaders endorse same-sex unions, it is gaining popularity. Many churches and Christians are struggling to reconcile the clear teaching of Scripture with a desire to be in step with the culture. But often, Christians do not know how to engage the culture with this issue, or how to help people in the church who are struggling in this area. And who decides?

In an unintimidating booklet format, they answer questions including:. This booklet openly and frankly discusses the facts while avoiding vulgarity or graphic descriptions of homosexual behavior and helps clear away much of the confusion and misinformation that characterizes the debate. Why not order a case lot of at a heavily discounted prices.

See the webstore for prices in your country. We have supplied this link to an article on an external website in good faith. But we cannot assume responsibility for, nor be taken as endorsing in any way, any other content or links on any such site. Even the article we are directing you to could, in principle, change without notice on sites we do not control.

Helpful Resources. Creation Answers Book. Soft cover. AU October 23rd, Was thinking about this subject on my way to work yesterday somehow also opened email and receive CMI newsletter with similar topic. However, after some long thinking, are not the victims actually those who hold to the conservative definition of marriage male and female for life?

Their right of "proper" marriage are actually invaded. Naturally not religiously , same sex marriage is "abnormal" north side of the magnet does not go with the north side, this is also true in animal kingdom, and of course also true if we look at our bodies. How about for this case? The argument that we should support same sex marriage because it is love and love is good is not sufficient. For love there is brotherhood and sisterhood. There are some cases where someone has tendency to steal.

Should we legalise theft? How about with someone who is born to be a killer? Someone with never ending lust for sex? Don't forget we are all sinner, we have tendency to sin anyway, but should we support the sin? Keith S. AU October 21st, Dear Lita and Gary, While I understand your wanting to avoid the details of homosexual behaviour, it is also the general tactic of homosexuals to keep such details hidden.

Our motive for shunning homosexual behaviour must always be that it is sin. However, that motive does little to demonstrate to the casual supporter of such behaviour just how disgusting homosexual practices are. Further, they have no basis for understanding how dangerous and costly they are to society both economically and socially. Lita Cosner October 21st, Keith, there may be a limited audience of people actively engaged in the debate who may need to know the details of 'as bad as it gets' in homosexuality.

We wanted this to be a resource that, for instance, parents could share with their teenaged children who have questions, without worrying about their children being exposed to details about the actual practices.

And 'disgusting' has nothing to do with why it's sinful or wrong; even if it wasn't disgusting, it would still be sinful. And something could be disgusting without being sinful, in theory. Ephesians says, "It is shameful even to speak of the things they do in secret. And we as authors did not want to be responsible for introducing people to the knowledge of such evil practices.

US October 16th, It is just like the Bible says about people being "lovers of themselves". That's what we are seeing in society today. People don't want to do what is right. They want to glorify themselves, what they want and to hell with God.

When we rebel against God, we always work against ourselves. That's how nature works. It is better for people if they work to stay away from sin and that's what homosexuality it, a sin. This makes the demons scream when said, but it is the truth, no matter what anyone thinks, even me. AU October 15th, It was for this purpose that He made them male and female. I have not read this book yet, but as a Born Again Christian, I would just like to share my understanding of the Bible and God's Love in this issue.

To me the Word of God is clear that homosexuality is wrong. I think we must follow God's example, love the sinner but not the sin.

We do not have to like or agree with the homosexual lifestyle or gay marriage or vote in favour of it, When the time comes, God is quite capable of judging without our help. We are on this earth to let the light of Jesus shine through us, showing love and compassion for those who are lost and pray for them. We do not have to treat these people with disdain, disrespect or shun them.

Let the compassion of Jesus rise in us, pray and let the Holy Spirit work. Gary Bates October 15th, Diane, like so many issues in this world we need to strike a balance in our approach.

But I think my colleagues would agree with me when I say that as Christians, I believe it is actually our job to judge sin--particularly areas where the Bible's teaching is clear on the matter. Many churches have measures to judge and deal with sin within congregations, for example.

The writings of the Apostles are pretty clear on judging misbehavior and dealing with it. And in the book of Revelations, believers are given a role along with Christ to judge. I think that when Christ is saying 'not to judge others' you'll note he focuses on the heart attitude of the person judging. We ought not to have a judgmental attitude with great beams or logs in our eyes.

The booklet seeks to understand that homosexuality is a genuine issue that people struggle with and often they feel that they cannot do anything about their 'orientation' etc. But to let people continue to sin and fall outside of Christ would not be kind, hence why we are given the ability to judge, but in love, of course. I think it would be a valuable read for you given your sentiments as it displays a lot of compassion for those trapped in the lifestyle.

Monika C. It is a sad situation that a separate publication on this topic 'Gay marriage: right or wrong? Obviously, people need to go back to spending time reading God's word. There are many mentions in the Bible about homosexuality - just consider what happened nto Sodom and Gomorrah but then again, the Bible is no longer considered as God's word by which to live.

Truly, we are living in the last days! Bob S. US October 15th, Lita: I hear you saying that the tone of the booklet is engaging and constructive. But I must repeat that there are far, far worse issues for modern society than gay marriage.

Lita Cosner October 15th, I'm not concerned with 'getting very far in government'; we wrote this booklet to and for Christians and those interested in the biblical view on the issue. I read your blog, though our feedback rules don't allow us to publish the link.

Frankly, that blog demonstrates that at least in this area, the Bible is not your authority and you have a low view of Scripture. As such, we'll probably talk past each other. But what I find surprising is that you aren't even able to put yourself in an evangelical's shoes and see why it would be a huge issue to us, and well-worth publishing a booklet about. Michael M. US October 13th, If I may, I really urge that the phrase "gay marriage" not be used to describe "same sex marriage". There has not been any problem heretofore with a "gay" person marrying.

New laws were not needed for a "gay" person to marry. Heterosexual and homosexual persons heretofore had the same rights to marry.

If you were a man and you wanted to marry, you found a woman who would have you and you got married. If you were a woman and wanted to marry, you found a man who would have you and you got married. If you wanted to have close friends of the same sex, in addition to having a spouse of the opposite sex, you did. No problem. Now, in some US states and other countries where "same sex marrige" unfortunately is legal, a man can marry a man and a woman can marry a woman.

In such places, if you are a man and want to marry, you can marry a man or a woman, and if you are a woman you can marry a woman or a man. So I submit that what we have now is marriage and "same sex marriage", not marriage and "gay marriage".

Same sex marriages right or wrong

Same sex marriages right or wrong

Same sex marriages right or wrong