Opposing same sex marriag-that oppose same-sex marriage - Wikipedia

In the debate over gay marriage, opponents have many arguments that profess their belief that it should not be legal. These include many moral and religious reasons that point to a threat to the sacred institution of marriage. This debate brings up many questions. In an attempt to understand the issue, let's examine common arguments against same-sex marriage and why they may not stand up in modern America. Is there even a point to same-sex couples getting married?

Opposing same sex marriag

Opposing same sex marriag

Opposing same sex marriag

Opposing same sex marriag

Studies show, for example, that even when homosexual men commit themselves to a partner, many still regularly engage in sex with other men several times a year. About Pew Research Opposing same sex marriag Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. As explained by People for the American Opposing same sex marriag, "As a legal matter, marriage is a civil institution So is everything else. Con 11 People should not have their tax dollars used to support something they believe is wrong. Some have even suggested that God made them as homosexuals. Gas is too expensive in California. The natural tendency of such a union is not to create families.

Older is better. AGAINST Gay Marriage

The article presumably refers to Scandinavian studies that are the work of right-wing author Stanley Kurtz who attempted to prove that same-sex marriage decreased the rate of heterosexual marriage in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. On 31 Januarythe Italian Supreme Court of Cassation ruled that same-sex marriages performed abroad Opposing same sex marriag be fully recognized by court order, when Man being hung least one of the Opposing same sex marriag spouses is a citizen of a European Union country where same-sex marriage is legal. Updated February 13, The Australian Psychological Society supports same-sex marriage [27] and the British Psychological Society has acknowledged that there is no empirical basis for beliefs used to argue for the exclusion of same-sex attracted individuals from marriage. Inthe U. Same-sex marriage is not explicitly prohibited under Indian law and at least one couple has had their marriage recognised by the courts. That same bill was approved by the Chamber of Deputies on 11 May with deputies in favour and 51 against. Since NovemberFrance has had a civil union scheme known as a civil solidarity pact that is open to both opposite-sex and same-sex couples. Rather, anthropological research supports the conclusion that a vast array of family types, including families built upon same-sex partnerships, can contribute to stable and humane societies. Opposing same sex marriag, God ties His image to human sexuality. This is only legal in a few states, including California and Oregon. Between mid and Maysame-sex couples had their cohabitation issues converted into marriages in several Brazil states with the approval of a state judge. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Support for same-sex marriage has steadily grown over the past 15 years.

  • What does the Bible say about?
  • A large and growing body of scientific evidence indicates that the intact, married family is best for children.

In the debate over gay marriage, opponents have many arguments that profess their belief that it should not be legal. These include many moral and religious reasons that point to a threat to the sacred institution of marriage. This debate brings up many questions. In an attempt to understand the issue, let's examine common arguments against same-sex marriage and why they may not stand up in modern America.

Is there even a point to same-sex couples getting married? Why would they want to bother? Whether a marriage is between a man and a woman or two people of the same sex, the reasons behind getting married are the same. There are, of course, the legal, property, and financial benefits of being married. These include the right of one partner to make medical decisions for the other and the joint ownership of a home or other property. Married couples can also handle their financial affairs, from banking to taxes, jointly.

It may include children or be the couple on their own. Either way, a marriage certificate is the foundation of a family unit and this is extremely important to many people. Opponents of marriage equality usually insist that marriage is only legitimate when it's between a man and a woman.

Where does that leave people who are not quite either male or female - at least according to the definitions ordinarily employed? Defining marriage in terms of sex begs the question of how we define a person's sex in the first place. What is a "man" and what is a "woman"? Using strict terminology, there are people for whom marriage to anyone might be permanently denied. This means that gay marriage amounts to a form a sacrilege, not to mention an intrusion of the state into a religious matter.

It's true that religion has traditionally played a role in sanctifying marriages. In the end, this belief is simply incorrect. The contract of marriage is also a compact between two individuals, a promise to care for one another.

Marriage has never been dependent on a single religion and is, instead, a result of human desire which is supported by the community as a whole. Closely connected with the idea that marriage is necessarily religious is the belief that marriage is sacred or even a type of sacrament. This argument is rarely made explicit. It also motivates much of their vehemence in a way that would be hard to explain otherwise.

Indeed, if it weren't for the idea that marriage is sacred, it seems unlikely that ongoing debate would be as rancorous as it is. The idea that gay couples shouldn't be allowed to marry because they can't procreate is extremely popular.

If marriage only exists for the purpose of having children , then how can infertile couples be allowed to marry? The simple fact is that this argument depends on using a standard that is not applied to straight couples. It's no surprise that opponents of gay marriage frequently complain that such marriages would undermine the institution of marriage.

A marriage between members of the same sex is a self-contradiction, according to opponents, so their unions will somehow harm marriage itself.

Just how much damage could gay unions do, though? And how? This objection to gay marriage doesn't even try to pretend to be objective and fair. It focuses instead directly on people's animus towards gays and lesbians.

Homosexual relationships are treated explicitly as abnormal and unnatural. This easily leads to the conclusion that said relationships should not be given any sort of legal or social status. Opposition to equal civil rights for gays comes in many forms. When all of the arguments that gay marriage is an intrinsically bad fail, religious conservatives move to argue that such marriages will somehow infringe on their own civil rights.

However, thus far conservatives have failed to explain how or why treating gays like fully equal citizens and human beings is incompatible with anyone's religious liberty. Since when did the preservation of religious rights require treating minorities like second-class citizens? Many choose to marvel at the discovery that it only mentions men and women marrying, then sagely conclude that gays can't possibly marry.

This approach ignores the fact that the nature of marriage has changed in definition and makeup quite often over the centuries. Marriage today isn't at all like what it was two millennia or even two centuries ago. Given how broad and fundamental the changes in the nature of marriage have been, what exactly are traditionalists trying to defend, and why?

What is truly "traditional" about modern marriage? It's also about the future of American civil law. Opponents of gay marriage try to offer legal and social reasons for their position. Yet, it always comes back to religion and religion-based animosity towards gays. For Christian Nationalists, legalized gay marriage would represent a defeat for their religion in the fight to define the boundaries of American culture and law. Those who possess that authority and power and who have used them to create their identities are thereby threatened by the perspective changes.

One thing that has often puzzled many people is the argument from so many religious and political conservatives that same-sex marriages "threaten" and "undermine" traditional heterosexual marriages.

The same is said even about domestic partnership laws which would give same-sex partners a few of the same basic rights as married couples. Marriage is not just an institution, but also a symbol representing our culture's ideas about sex, sexuality, and human relationships.

Symbols are important; they are a common cultural currency which we each use to help create our sense of self. Thus, when the traditional nature of marriage is challenged in any way, so are people's basic identities. Share Flipboard Email. Table of Contents Expand.

What is a Marriage Between a Man and a Woman? Marriage: Religious Rite or Civil Right? Marriage is Sacred and a Sacrament.

Marriage is for Raising Children. Incompatible with Religious Liberty. It Can't Be a Real Marriage. Marriage as a Cultural Symbol. Austin Cline, a former regional director for the Council for Secular Humanism, writes and lectures extensively about atheism and agnosticism.

Why is this? How can one relationship threaten or undermine someone else's? Continue Reading. Learn Religions uses cookies to provide you with a great user experience. By using Learn Religions, you accept our.

Share Tweet Email 1. Research Areas U. And behold, God has granted you all those who sail with you. The ruling was published in the judicial bulletin on November 26, , meaning that same-sex marriage will become legal on May 26, , at the latest. This paper is reprinted with permission of the Witherspoon Institute, Princeton, New Jersey, on whose website a version of it first appeared at www.

Opposing same sex marriag

Opposing same sex marriag

Opposing same sex marriag

Opposing same sex marriag. Same Sex Marriage Debate

.

Ten Arguments From Social Science Against Same-Sex Marriage

Support for same-sex marriage has steadily grown over the past 15 years. And today, support for same-sex marriage remains near its highest point since Pew Research Center began polling on this issue. Among people who are religiously unaffiliated, a solid majority have supported same-sex marriage since Support for same-sex marriage among white evangelical Protestants remains lower than it is among other religious groups.

Religious affiliation Religious attendance. Support for same-sex marriage has remained largely stable among both men and women since Support for same-sex marriage also has remained steady among whites, blacks and Hispanics over the past two years. The increase in the share of adults who favor same-sex marriage over the past 15 years is due in part to generational change.

Younger generations express higher levels of support for same-sex marriage. About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions.

It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts. Leaned party Detailed party Party and ideology. Research Areas U.

Opposing same sex marriag